Birding Photography

 
Avatar-104x104_100 elaine mickler 5 post(s)

I own a Canon EOS 30D camera. I am looking for a moderate telephoto zoom lens.
My choice at this point is a Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Autofocus Telephoto zoom lens. I am interested in opinions from others interested in getting those great close ups of birds. I can’t really justify purchasing a $1-5,000.00 lens, as it is just a hobby, but I am a perfectionist in my arts, and want the best I can get for around $ 5-600.00 range.

Thanks for any advice you can offer. My skills are more luck than training or ability at this time.

Thanks again,
Elana

 
Profilebirdpost_100 Andy Wilson 12 post(s)

Sorry for the late response but I do not come here very often.

As for lens, always buy the best lens that you can afford.

Good site for lens reviews.
http://www.photozone.de/Reviews/overview
http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/index.php
http://www.cameralabs.com/lenses/Canon_DSLR_lens_listing.shtml

 
Avatar-104x104_100 Frank Fickel 2 post(s)

300mm is very short for birding photography. You will need 400mm or better 500mm. One of the best choices is using a 300mm/2.8 with 2xKonverter, which means a 600mm/5.6 in total. I’m using a 100-400mm L IS Lens from Canon and thats to short in many cases.

Frank

 
Avatar-104x104_100 elaine mickler 5 post(s)

Frank and Andy,
Thanks for the information. I will try the 2X Konverter with a 300mm for now. I will save up for a better one later.
I have been lucky with my shots with what I had. I see others that are better quality and it makes you want more.
I have had more opportunities to see some great wildlife than lots of people, but haven’t had the equipment. I lived in
the wilderness in Canada for ten years and have traveled from Alaska to South America.
Thanks again,
Elaine

 
Canada_goose_img_5294_100 Craig Stewart 13 post(s)

Hi Elana this reply is quite late for your post but I only just discovered the forums. I am currently using a 300mm lens on my Olympus E510, for smaller birds I found you have to be within about 20 feet for a decent shot. A consideration when using a 300mm lens is stabilization. My camera has stabilization built in, but it is not always effective when at maximum zoom. I use a monopod when out and a tripod at home. The tripod is great and the monopod is very good and easy to carry while walking with the camera attached. I have been looking at teleconvertors and have been told that the 2x will cause you to loose 2 f stops. Also using a teleconvertor will dramatically add to the shake factor. Good luck let us know how you make out.

 
Avatar-104x104_100 elaine mickler 5 post(s)

Hi, Well I got the 70-300mm and then found how much it lacked for what I wanted. I now have the 100-400mm and a 50D EOS
and would like more…as time goes by more will come. I love the 100-400 lens. It is easy to carry and can catch some great shots.
Next purchase may be a Canon 7D..
Now I am hooked….
Elaine

 
Canada_goose_img_5294_100 Craig Stewart 13 post(s)

I find the 70-300 IS lens a little limited too, best results are if the bird is within about 20 feet. Teleconverters seem to have mixed results with this lens, a 1.4x Kenko for about $200 seems to have half decent results, dependent on how picky you are about your results.
Congratulations on your 100-400mm acquisition, I would love one but can’t afford it right now, maybe next year. I would like the Canon 100-400 L IS lens and the 1.4x Kenko teleconverter.

Tell other birders about your favorite places, your favorite field guides, your favorite bird-related books, etc.


Moderators

This forum is currently unmoderated.

Please always be courteous.